Proof, not promises
From a 30% gap to 99.9% accuracy.
Before Fenyx had a name, it was a method Matt Lane ran from a supervisor's desk. A multi-branch distribution operation was bleeding accuracy — roughly a 30% gap between what the system said and what the racks held. The fix was not new software. It was three procedures, written from the floor up, trained the same week, and enforced every shift.
Those three procedures rolled out across a 63-branch network. The gap closed to 99.9% and held — not because the people changed, but because the knowledge stopped living only in heads and started living in the process.
Fenyx is that method turned into an operating layer. Westline DC — Inland Empire is the live proof tenant in the demo: a fictional mid-market DC running real utility-fittings rules like FX-014 (heat-treat stamp before PO putaway) and FX-041 (grave-shift slot drift on the A-14 family), with count autopsies that rank the process chain behind every variance — and a Ghost Hunt that walks you from "system says it's here, it isn't" to the procedure that fixes it.
Fenyx is that method in software. Westline DC is a fictional tenant so you can press the buttons. The 99.9% is the historical hold after three procedures rolled to 63 branches — not a demo number.
Fenyx is the accuracy operating layer that sits beside your WMS. Living rules. Count autopsy. Ghost hunt. It does not replace SAP. It does not post adjustments.
